Role of Animal Husbandry Nutrition Science on Feed, Food and Environment Safety
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47577/biochemmed.v6i.9554Keywords:
Nutrient, livestock, safe, feed, animal food, environmentAbstract
Animal protein is an important part of the human diet to support physical activities. The role of livestock as a source of animal protein requires adequate nutrition from feed to be able to produce optimally. The feed must be given in adequate amount of quality and quantity, safe feed (not toxic) is a must, and this cannot be separated from the contribution of animal husbandry nutrition science. Formulation of feed ingredients based on local feed and agro-industrial by-products into complete feeds in ruminant production is a strategy to meet the nutritional needs of ruminants so that they can produce optimally, efficiently, and environmentally friendly which ultimately produces products that are safe for human consumption. The success of this strategy has a greater opportunity through a corporate-based livestock approach, and through this approach, it is expected that the concepts of safe feed, safe food, and safe environment can be realized. Based on this phenomenon, animal husbandry nutrition science has proven its capability to contribute significantly to 1) produce livestock (ruminants) with efficient nutrition; 2) improve food safety and quality of food products originating from livestock for human consumption; 3) improve health status and welfare of livestock; and 4) reduce greenhouse gas emissions and the impact of livestock on environmental security.
References
Food and Agriculture (FAO). 2023. Global feed safety platform. https://www.fao.org/feed-safety/background/why-feed-safety/en/
Directorate General of Animal Husbandry and Animal Health of Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Indonesia. 2022. Statistics of Livestock and Animal Health. Directorate General of Animal Husbandry and Animal Health of Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Indonesia. https://ditjenpkh.pertanian.go.id/berita/1609-buku-statistik-peternakan-dan-kesehatan-hewan-tahun-2022
Food and Agriculture (FAO). 2023. Food safety and quality. https://www.fao.org/food-safety/background/qa-on-food-safety/en/
Mayulu, H. 2019. Teknologi Pakan Ruminansia (Ruminants Feed Technology). Rajawali Pres. PT RajaGrafindo Persada, Depok. ISBN 978-623-231-146-6. https://www.scribd.com/document/508393397/18hamdi-Mayulu-Buku-Teknologi-Pakan
Mayulu, H. 2020. Karakteristik pakan ruminansia (Ruminants Feed Characteristic). Rajawali Pres. PT RajaGrafindo Persada, Depok. ISBN: 978-623-231-392-7. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=qrjTEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA15&dq=%3Dhamdi+mayulu&ots=iYANy7hzds&sig=V1cWyZ4-yXYPLHtM9spE34n6Qk4&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%3Dhamdi%20mayulu&f=false
Rasjid, S. 2011. The Great Ruminant: Nutrisi, Pakan, dan Manajemen Produksi (The Great Ruminants: Nutrient, Feed, and Production Management). Brilian Internasional. ISBN 978-602-19546-1-4. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/THE_GREAT_RUMINANT.html?id=ZGCiDwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Mayulu, H., N. Fauziah, M. I. Haris, M. Christiyanto and Sunarso. 2018. Digestibility value and fermentation level of local feed-based ration for sheep. Animal Production, 20 (2):95-102. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jap.2018.20.2.706
Mayulu, H., F. Rahayu, M. Christiyanto, M. I. Haris, T. P. Daru, and S. N. Rahmatullah. 2020. Evaluation of digestibility value and rumen fermentation kinetic of goat’s local feed-based ration. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7 (8): 3703-3711. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359364860_European_Journal_of_Molecular_Clinical_Medicine_Evaluation_Of_Digestibility_Value_And_Rumen_Fermentation_Kinetic_Of_Goat's_Local_Feed-_Based_Ration
Mayulu, H., Suyadi, M. Christiyanto, Sunarso, T. P. Daru, and M. I. Haris. 2020. In vitro digestibility and fermentation ruminant pf buffalo ration based on Neptunia plena L. Benth dan Leersia hexandra Swartz as local resources. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan, 30 (2): 148-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiip.2020.030.02.07
Mayulu, H. 2022. Lingkungan dan produktivitas ruminansia (Environment and ruminants productivity). Rajawali Pres. PT RajaGrafindo Persada, Depok. ISBN: 978-623-372-585-9. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=TLnTEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=%3Dhamdi+mayulu&ots=RBQVy8ErfI&sig=_xvc_HaspwsU5Mcfv1sqo7iDxCM&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%3Dhamdi%20mayulu&f=false
Mayulu, H., T. P. Daru, I. Tricahyadinata. 2023. In vitro evaluation of ruminal digestibilty and fermentation characteristics of local feeds. F1000Research 11: 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.123177.3
Mayulu, H., T. P. Daru, Suyadi, and M. Christiyanto. 2020. Nutrient potential of Coix lacryma-jobi L. as ruminants feed source in East Kalimantan. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24 (10): 1460-1470. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359364774_NUTRIENT_POTENTIAL_OF_Coix_Lachryma-Jobi_L_AS_RUMINANT_FEED_SOURCE_IN_EAST_KALIMANTAN
Daru, T. P., M. Sari and H. Mayulu. 2023. Coix lacryma-jobi L. nutritional value concerning nitrogen fertilizer doses. American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Science, 18 (2): 117-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3844/ajavsp.2023.117.124
Kim, S. O., S. J. Yun, B. Jung, E. H. Lee, D. H. Hahm, I. Shim, and H. J. Lee. 2004. Hypolipidemic effects of crude extract of adlay seed (Coix lachrymajobi var. mayuen) in obesity rat fed high fat diet : Relations of TNF-α and leptin mRNA expressions and serum lipid levels. Life Sciences 75 1391-1404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2004.03.006
Nurmala, T. 2010. Potency and prospect on the development of Hanjeli Coix Lacryma-jobi L. as a fat-rich nutritious food to support food diversification towards independent food security. Pangan 20 (1): 41-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33964/jp.v20i1.10
Wild, K. J., H. Steinga, and M. Rodehutscord. 2019. Variability of in vitro ruminal fermentation and nutritional value of cell‐disrupted and nondisrupted microalgae for ruminants. GCB Bioenergy 11: 345-359. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12539
Mayulu, H., Sunarso , C. I. Sutrisno, and Sumarsono. 2010. Kebijakan Pengembangan Peternakan Sapi Potong di Indonesia (Policy on the Development of Cattle in Indonesia). Jurnal Litbang Pertanian 29 (1): 34-41. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21082/jp3.v29n1.2010.p%p
Mayulu, H. 2015. Pakan sapi potong dan efisiensi usaha penggemukan (Cattle feed and fattening business efficiency). Unnes Press. Semarang. ISBN: 978 602 285 045 8. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=955026
Mayulu, H. T. P. Daru, A. Supriyadi, and M. Ghazali. 2020. The potential of rice straw as a source of feed ingredients for beef cattle in East Kalimantan. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7 (20): 3712-3724. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358046710_European_Journal_of_Molecular_Clinical_Medicine_The_Potential_Of_Rice_Straw_As_A_Source_Of_Feed_Ingredients_For_Beef_Cattle_In_East_Kalimantan
Lalman, D., G. Horn, R. Huhnke, and D. Sparks. 2017. Ammoniation of low quality roughages. Oklahoma Cooperative Extention Service. https://shareok.org/rest/bitstreams/2b333eaf-7ec2-434f-be16-a0eef210546a/retrieve
Mayulu, H and Suhardi. 2015. Nutrient Potency of Rice Straw Processed with Amofer as Cattle Feed Stuff in East Kalimantan. International Journal of Science and Engineering, 9 (2):101-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12777/ijse.9.2.101-105
Mayulu, H. 2014. The nutrient digestibility of locally sheep fed with amofer palm oil byproduct-based complete feed. International Journal of Science and Engineering, 7(2): 106-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12777/ijse.7.2.106-111
Mayulu, H. 2014. The nutrient potency of palm oil plantation and mill’s by-product processed with amofer technology as ruminant feed. International Journal of Science and Engineering, 6 (2): 112-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12777/ijse.6.2.112-116
Mayulu, H., Sunarso, M. Christiyanto and F. I. Ballo. 2013. Intake and digestibility of cattle’s ration on complete feed based-on fermented ammonization rice straw with different protein level. International Journal of Science and Engineering, 4 (2): 86-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12777/ijse.4.2.2013.86-91
Adesogan, A. T., A. H. Havelaar, S. L. M. Kune, M. Eilittä, and G. E. Dahl. 2020. Animal source foods: Sustainability problem or malnutrition and sustainability solution? Perspective matters. Global Food Security, 25: 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100325
Soren, N. M., V. Sejian, M. Terhuja and G. Dominic. 2017. Enteric methane emission in sheep: process description and factors influencing production. Adaptive mechanisms of sheep to climate change. Sejian, V., R. Bhatta, J. Gaughan, P. K. Malik, S. M. K. Naqvi, and R. Lal (Ed). In “Sheep Production Adapting to Climate Change”. (pp:209-233). Springer Nature Singapore. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4714-5_10
Hyder, I., P. R. K. Reddy, J. Raju, P. Manjari, C. S. Prasad, K. A. Kumar, and V. Sejian. 2017. Alteration in rumen functions and diet digestibility during heat stress in sheep. Sejian, V., R. Bhatta, J. Gaughan, P. K. Malik, S. M. K. Naqvi, and R. Lal (Ed). In “Sheep Production Adapting to Climate Change”. (pp:235-265). Springer Nature Singapore. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4714-5_11
Monteiro, A, L. G., A. M. C. F. Faro, M. T. P. Peres, R. Batista, C. H. E. C. Poli, and J. J.Villalba. 2018. The role of small ruminants on global climate change. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, 40 (e43124): 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v40i1.43124
Chika, E., A. Martins, and A. Augustine. 2015. The contribution of ruminant animals to climate change and its mitigation strategies. P. Kumar ‘Bharti’ and K. Gajananda (Ed). In Natural Ecosystem and Climate Change (71-86). Discovery Publishing House PVT. Ltd. 4383/4B, Ansari Road, Darya Ganj New Delhi–110002 (India). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283721857_The_Contribution_of_Ruminant_Animals_to_Climate_Change_and_its_Mitigation_Strategies
Aluwong, T., P. A. Wuyep and L. Allam. 2011. Livestock-environment interactions: Methane emissions from ruminants. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(8): 1265-1269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB10.1117
Downing, M. M. R., A. P. Nejadhashemi, T. Harrigan and S. A. Woznicki. 2017. Climate change and livestock: impact, adaptation, and mitigation. Climate Risk Management, 16: 145-163. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2017.02.001
Thomas, D.T., Y.G. Beletse, S. Dominik, and S.A. Lehnert. 2021. Net protein contribution and enteric methane production of pasture and grain-finished beef cattle supply chains. Animal The international journal of animal biosciences, 15: 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2021.100392
Mayulu, H., I. Tricahyadinata, and A. Soepriyadi. 2023. The development of corporate-based cattle breeding areas. Transaction of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery, 54 (6): 168-181. http://nyjxxb.net/index.php/journal/article/view/1630/0
Steinfeld, H. 2019. Improved manure management towards sustainable agri-food systems. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Broadening Horizons. Feedipedia. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/Keynote_20191202%20COP25_FAO_Koronivia-version3.pdf
Bhatta, R., P. K. Malik, and V. Sejian. 2017. Enteric methane emission and reduction strategies in sheep. Sejian, V., R. Bhatta, J. Gaughan, P. K. Malik, S. M. K. Naqvi, and R. Lal (Ed). In “Sheep Production Adapting to Climate Change”. (pp: 291-305). Springer Nature Singapore. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4714-5_13
