Humour in Joel Pett’s Environmental Cartoons on Climate Change

Main Article Content

Živilė Nemickienė
Dovilė Vengalienė

Abstract

The discourse of humour has become a common research topic, but few have analysed the use of humour in environmental cartoons. This study analyses the use of humour in the climate change cartoons of the famous American cartoonist Joel Pett. The analysis explores the verbal and non-verbal means of constructing humour and their interplay. The research was conducted by analysing Joel Pett’s environmental cartoons, examining their content, language and visuals, and identifying the means that enabled the amusing effect. The analysis revealed that the most common verbal means of humour construction in Joel Pett’s climate change cartoons were irony and satire. The study also showed that an interplay between visual and verbal means facilitated humour. In most cases, multimodality, or the interplay between verbal and non-verbal means, was an essential element that allowed the reader to perceive humour. Therefore, it can be suggested that both modes are equally important in the construction of humour in Joel Pett’s environmental cartoons. The results of this study can be used to begin to analyse how humour appears in the work of different environmental cartoonists.


Article Details

How to Cite
Nemickienė, Živilė, & Vengalienė, D. (2024). Humour in Joel Pett’s Environmental Cartoons on Climate Change. Technium Education and Humanities, 8, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.47577/teh.v8i.10836
Section
Articles

References

K. Binstead, O. Takizawa (1998). Computer generation of puns in Japanese. Kobe: Communications Research Laboratory.

C. Colebrook (2006). “Irony” (New Critical Idiom). London: Routledge. p. 179.

Collins English Dictionary. (2003). Glasgow: HarperCollins Publishers.

G. Cook (2001). “The Discourse of Advertising”. London: Routledge.

Ch. Forceville (2006). “Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising”. London: Routledge.

Ch. Forceville, E. Urios-Aparisi (2009). “Multimodal Metaphor”. Berlin: Walter de

Gruyter GmbH & Co. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366

J. Garmendia (2018). “Irony”. London: Cambridge University Press.

L. Harvey, R. Edrada-Ebel, & R. J. Quinn. (2015). The re-emergence of natural products for drug discovery in the genomics era. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 14(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd4510

Q. Herzberg, X. Herzberg, & L. Herzberg (2012). “Chinese Proverbs and Popular Sayings: With Observations on Culture and Language”. Stone Bridge Press.

G. Kress (2010). “Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication”. London: Routledge.

A. Pollard (2018). “Satire”. London: Routledge.

A. Ross (2005). “The Language of Humour”. London: Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.1021/la0504098

P. Simpson (2003). “On the Discourse of Satire: Towards a stylistic model of satirical humour”. Volume 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.2

P. Simpson (2004). “Stylistics”. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.2104/aral07 [15] V. Tsakona, D. E. Popa (2011). “Studies in Political Humour”. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.14

P. R. Wendt (1956). THE LANGUAGE OF PICTURES. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 13(4), 281-287.WENDT, P., R., 1956. THE LANGUAGE OF PICTURES. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, vol. 13, no. 4. Available at: www.jstor.org/stable/42581627. [Accessed 19 August 2023]