Influence of social media information acceptance on university students' shopping intention
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines how accepting information on social media—and the factors that shape that acceptance—affects students’ intention to shop for sustainable goods. A survey of 160 Bangladeshi university students found clear, consistent patterns. Positive attitudes toward information on social media increased both the perceived usefulness of that information and the willingness to accept it, and also directly raised intention to shop via social platforms. Perceived usefulness further strengthened information acceptance, and acceptance, in turn, increased shopping intention. Attitudes toward information had the strongest effect on perceived usefulness and a sizable direct effect on intention, revealing two pathways: a direct persuasive route and an indirect route through usefulness and acceptance. These results extend established behavioral and information-adoption theories to a developing, collectivist setting. Practically, brands and educators should provide transparent, specific, and verifiable content, and support peer-led communities that help students judge credibility—thereby turning interest in sustainability into confident purchase intentions.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
[1] Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
[2] Al Asheq, A., Tanchi, K. R., Akhter, S., Kamruzzaman, M., & Islam, K. A. (2022). Examining university students’ behaviors towards online shopping: an empirical investigation in an emerging market. Innovative Marketing, 18(1), 94-103.
[3] Bryła, P., Chatterjee, S., & Ciabiada-Bryła, B. (2022). The impact of social media marketing on consumer engagement in sustainable consumption: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(24), 16637.
[4] Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2012). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1.
[5] Cheung, C. M., & Thadani, D. R. (2012). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and integrative model. Decision support systems, 54(1), 461-470.
[6] Cheung, C. M. K., Lee, M. K. O., & Rabjohn, N. (2008). The adoption of online opinions in online customer communities. Internet Research, 18(3), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240810883290
[7] Chu, S. C., & Kim, Y. (2011). Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. International journal of Advertising, 30(1), 47-75.
[8] Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
[9] DataReportal. (2024). Digital 2024: Bangladesh. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-bangladesh?rq=Bangladesh (Accessed September 27, 2025).
[10] Erkan, I., & Evans, C. (2018). Social media or shopping websites? The influence of eWOM on consumers’ online purchase intentions. Journal of marketing communications, 24(6), 617-632.
[11] Filieri, R. (2015). What makes online reviews helpful? A diagnosticity-adoption framework to explain informational and normative influences in e-WOM. Journal of Business Research, 68(6), 1261-1270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.006
[12] Fu, J. R., Lu, I. W., Chen, J. H. F., & Farn, C. K. (2020). Investigating consumers’ online social shopping intention: An information processing perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 54, 102189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102189
[13] Hafez, M. (2023). The nexus between social media marketing efforts and overall brand equity in the banking sector in Bangladesh: Testing a moderated mediation model. Journal of Internet Commerce, 22(2), 293–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2022.2042968
[14] Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
[15] Hajli, N. (2015). Social commerce constructs and consumers’ intention to buy. Information & Management, 52(2), 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.12.005
[16] Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
[17] Horrich, A., Ertz, M., & Bekir, I. (2025). Unraveling the dynamics of social media influencers on sustainable purchase intentions and environmental awareness among people with disabilities: a focus on the moderating role of disability types. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 37(3), 177-192.
[18] Hussain, S., Ahmed, W., Jafar, R. M. S., Rabnawaz, A., & Jianzhou, Y. (2017). eWOM source credibility, perceived risk and food product customer's information adoption. Computers in human behavior, 66, 96-102.
[19] Islam, S., Islam, M. F., & Noor-E-Zannat, N. (2023). Behavioral intention to use online for shopping in Bangladesh: A Technology Acceptance Model analysis. SAGE Open, 13(3), Article 21582440231197495. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231197495
[20] Jacobson, J., Gruzd, A., & Hernández-García, Á. (2020). Social media marketing: Who is watching the watchers? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 101774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.03.001
[21] Kim, J., Kim, M., Choi, J., & Trivedi, M. (2019). Offline social interactions and online shopping demand: Does the degree of social interactions matter? Journal of Business Research, 99, 373–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.09.022
[22] Kongsompong, K., Green, R. T., & Patterson, P. G. (2009). Collectivism and social influence in the buying decision: A four-country study. Australasian Marketing Journal, 17(3), 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2009.05.002
[23] Leong, C. M., Loi, L. S., & Woon, L. F. (2021). The influence of social media eWOM on purchase intention: The mediating role of information adoption. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 9(2), 96–113. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-021-00132-9
[24] Mangold, W. G., & Faulds, D. J. (2009). Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business Horizons, 52(4), 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.03.002
[25] Meskaran, F., Ismail, Z., & Shanmugam, B. (2013). Online purchase intention: Effects of trust and security perception. Australian journal of basic and applied sciences, 7(6), 307-315.
[26] Mikum, S., Suksakulchai, S., Chaisanit, S., & Murphy, E. (2018). Students’ participation in peer-to-peer communication supported by social media. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 659–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9628-8
[27] Ngo, T. T. A., Vuong, B. L., Le, M. D., Nguyen, T. T., Tran, M. M., & Nguyen, Q. K. (2024). The impact of eWOM information in social media on the online purchase intention of Generation Z. Cogent business & management, 11(1), 2316933.
[28] Ringle, C. M., Wende, S. & Becker, J.-M. (2024), SmartPLS 4 [Computer software], SmartPLS GmbH, available at: https://www.smartpls.com.
[29] Saeed, M. A., Farooq, A., Kersten, W., & Ben Abdelaziz, S. I. (2019). Sustainable product purchase: Does information about product sustainability on social media affect purchase behavior? Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 4, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41180-019-0029-3
[30] Saha, S. K., Zhuang, G., & Li, S. (2020). Will consumers pay more for efficient delivery? An empirical study of what affects e-customers’ satisfaction and willingness to pay on online shopping in Bangladesh. Sustainability, 12(3), 1121. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031121
[31] Saunders, M. (2009). Research methods for business students (5th ed.). Pearson.
[32] Shareef, M. A., Mukerji, B., Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., & Islam, R. (2019). Social media marketing: Comparative effect of advertisement sources. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 46, 58-69.
[33] Statista. (2024), “Number of users in the digital media market in Bangladesh from 2017 to 2027”, Statista, available at: https://www.statista.com/forecasts/1435427/number-of-users-digital-media-digital-media-market-bangladesh (accessed September 27, 2025).
[34] Sussman, S. W., & Siegal, W. S. (2003). Informational influence in organizations: An integrated approach to knowledge adoption. Information systems research, 14(1), 47-65.
[35] Torres, P. J., Siakowska, M., Banaszewska, B., Pawelczyk, L., Duleba, A. J., Kelley, S. T., & Thackray, V. G. (2018). Gut microbial diversity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome correlates with hyperandrogenism. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 103(4), 1502-1511.
[36] Van den Bergh, J., De Pelsmacker, P., & Worsley, B. (2024). Beyond labels: Segmenting the Gen Z market for more effective marketing. Young Consumers, 25(2), 188–210. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-03-2023-1707
[37] Wang, X., Yu, C., & Wei, Y. (2012). Social media peer communication and impacts on purchase intentions: A consumer socialization framework. Journal of interactive marketing, 26(4), 198-208.
[38] Ward, S. (1974). Consumer socialization. Journal of consumer research, 1(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/2489100
[39] Zafar, A. U., Shen, J., Ashfaq, M. & Shahzad, M. (2021), “Social media and sustainable purchasing attitude: Role of trust in social media and environmental effectiveness”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 63, 102751.