Criminogenic asymmetries as the trigger of International fraud victimization in Indonesia – China trade relations. Study of victimization of Indonesian exporters

Main Article Content

Raden Muhammad Jauhari
Adrianus Meliala

Abstract

This study aims to examine criminogenic asymmetries as the triggering factors for the victimization of international fraud in Indonesia – China trade relations. The research uses a descriptive-qualitative approach with a case study method and limits it only from the perspective of Indonesia as a victim. Based on the identification and interpretation of research data using Levi’s (2009) typology and stages of fraud victimization and the concept of criminogenic asymmetries of Passa (1999), it was found that fraud crimes by transnational organized criminal groups occured on both sides of the Indonesia – China trade relationship, both as perpretrators and as victims. It also found victimization efforts by Chinese organized crime groups against Indonesian exporters when entering into trade contracts. There are four asymmetric criminogenic factors that have an impact on the victimization of Indonesian exporters in trade relations with China, namely the legal system, technology, knowledge and culture. Researchers also found that victimization by Chinese companies against Indonesian exporters is a form of international fraud. The researcher suggests that the victimization by Chinese criminal groups against Indonesian exporters should receive national legal facilities so that losses can be avoided.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Raden Muhammad Jauhari, & Meliala, A. (2021). Criminogenic asymmetries as the trigger of International fraud victimization in Indonesia – China trade relations. Study of victimization of Indonesian exporters. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 24(1), 679–695. Retrieved from https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/4832
Section
Sociology

References

Albanese, J. S. (2010). Organized Crime in Our Times. 6th Edition. Cincinnati: Anderson Publishing.

Andrews, D., & Bonta, J. (1994). The psychology of Criminal Conduct (5th Edition ed.). New Providence: Matthew Bender & Company, Inc, LexisNexis Group.

Arikunto, S. (2002). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek (Revisi V). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Bhakti, Yudha Ahmad, Ramli, Rudi M Rizki, Huala (1995). “Penerapan Doktrin Imunitas Kedaulatan Negara Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Forum Pengadilan.” Laporam Penelitian LEMLIT Universitas Padjadjaran Bandung.

Brawley, Mark R. (2003). The Politics of Globalization: Gaining Perspective, Assessing Consequences. 1st Edition, Broadview Press.

Button, Mark. (2010). Cross-border fraud and the case for an “Interfraud”, 285-303

Cressey, Donald. (1969). Theft of the Nation: The Structure and Operations of Organized Crime in America. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

Cross, Cassandra (2019). “Who is to blame? Exploring Accountability in Fraud Victimisation.” Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice.

Damanhuri, Didin S. (2008). Working Paper: Indonesia, Globalisasi Perekonomian & Kejahatan Ekonomi Internasional. Department of Economics Faculty of Economies and Management, Bogor Agricultural University.

Felson, Marcus (2003) ‘The Process of Co-offending’, in Martha Smith and Derek Cornish (eds) Theory for Practice in Situational Crime Prevention, Crime Prevention Studies vol. 16, pp. 149– 67. Mounsey, NJ: Criminal Justice Press.

Franko Aas, K. (2007). “Analysing a world in motion: Global flows meet criminology of the other.” Theoretical criminology, 11(2), 283-303.

Friedrichs, D. O. (2007). “Transnational crime and global criminology: Definitional, typological, and contextual conundrums.” Social Justice, 34(2 (108), 4-18.

Ghosh, B. (2007). “Managing Migration: Whither the Missing Regime? How Relevant is Trade Law to Such a Regime?” American Society of Internasional Law, Vol.101.

Levi, M. & Burrows, J. (2008). “Measuring the impact of fraud: a conceptual and empirical journey.” British Journal of Criminology, 48 (3), 293– 318.

Levi, M. (2008). “Organized fraud and organizing frauds: Unpacking research on networks and organization.” Criminology & Criminal Justice, 8(4), 389-419.

Levi, M. (2008). Criminology & Criminal Justice. SAGE Publications (Los Angeles, London, New Delhi and Singapore) and the British Society of Criminology.

Levi, M. (2015). “Money for crime and money from crime: Financing crime and laundering crime proceeds.” European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 21 (2), 1 – 23.

Levi, M. (2019). International Fraud. In M. Natarajan (Ed.), International and Transnational Crime and Justice (pp. 86-91). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Levi, M., & Lord, N. (2011). Links between Corruption and Organised Crime and Research Gaps. Non-State Actors in Asset Recovery, Bern: Peter Lang.

Manheim, Jarol B. dan Richard C. Rich. 1995. “From Abstract to Concrete: Operationalization and Measurement”, dalam Jarol B. Manheim dan Richard C. Rich. Empirical Political Analysis: Research Methods in Political Science. London: Longman Publisher, 56-83.

Massari, M. (2001). “Transnational Organized Crime between Myth and Reality: the Italian Case.” In Paper was presented on ECPR 29th Joint Sessions of Workshops Grenoble, France.

McLuhan, Marshall. (1962). The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Miraglia, P., Ochoa Hernandez, M., & Briscoe, I. (2012). Transnational organised crime and fragile states. (Global Factors Influencing the Risk of Conflict and Fragility; No. 5/2012). Oragnisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

Needleman, M., & Needlemen, C. (1979). Organizational Crime: Two Models of Criminogenesis. Sociological Quarterly vol.20, 517-528.

Neuman, W Lawrence, (2013). Social Research Methods: Qualitative andQuantitative Approaches, 7 Edition, (terjemahan). PT Indeks, Jakarta, hlm 142 – 449.

Olii, Mohammad Irvan. (2005). “Sempitnya Dunia, Luasnya Kejahatan? Sebuah Telaah Ringkas Tentang Transnational Crime.” Jurnal Kriminologi Indonesia, Vol. 4, No. I, 14-27.

Paoli, Letizia. (2002). “The Paradoxes of ORganized Crime.” Crime Law and Social Change, 37(1):51-97.

Paraschiv, G. (2013). “Conceptualizing Transnational Organized Crime”. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, 8(2), 173-178.

Passas, N. (1999). Globalization, criminogenic asymmetries and economic crime. Eur. JL Reform, 1, 399.

Passas, N. (2000). Global anomie, dysnomie, and economic crime: Hidden consequences of neoliberalism and globalization in Russia and around the world. Social Justice, 27(2 (80), 16-44.

Peacock, Robert (Ms.). (Juli 2011). “The 11th Asian Post Graduate Course on Victimology and Victim Assistance.” Jakarta: FH Universitas Indonesia.

Pudjiastuti, T. N. (2014). Konstruksi Kejahatan Terhadap Nelayan Tradisional Sebagai Pelaku Penyeludupan Migran Suatu Bentuk Viktimisasi Struktural dan Hegemoni Kultural. Depok: FISIP UI.

Putranti, Ika Riswanti, dan Paramasatya, Satwika. (2014). “Kejahatan Dalam Perdagangan Internasional: Perlindungan Hukum Produk Pertanian Lokal Dalam Pasar Bebas.” Jurnal ekonomi dan Bisnis.

Rahardjo, H. Mudjia. (2017). Studi Kasus dalam Penelitian Kualitatif: Konsep dan Prosedurnya. Malang: Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim.

Sandelowski, Margarete, Julie Barroso, (2006). Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. Springer Publishing Company, p 199-200.

Seyoum, B. (2013). Export-import theory, practices, and procedures. Routledge.

Shulzhenko, N., & Romashkin, S. (2020). “Internet Fraud and Transnational Organized Crime.” Juridical Tribune (Tribuna Juridica), 10(1), 162-172.

Thantawi. (2014). “Perlindungan Korban Tindak Pidana Cyber Crime dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Pascasarjana Universitas Syiah Kuala, 2(1).

Utama, T. C., Windiani, R., Hanura, M., Puspapertiwi, S., Dir, A. A. B., Putranti, I. R. & Farabi, N. (2016). “Pencegahan Praktik Kejahatan Ekonomi dalam Perdagangan Bebas–Origin Fraud dalam Industri Mebel Kayu Di Jepara.” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 15(1), 12-23.

Zaidan, M. A. (2016). “Kebijakan Kriminal Kejahatan Terhadap Ideologi Negara di Tengah Pusaran Globalisasi.” Pandecta, Vol. 11. No. 2.

Kementerian Perdagangan. (2019). Trade Dispute Matrix Resolution on 2019, Puska KPI, BP2KP.

Keputusan Presiden RI No 12/2014 Tentang Pencabutan Surat Edaran Presidium Kabinet Ampera Nomor SE-06/PRES.KAB/6/1967 tanggal 28 Juni 1967: Penggunaan istilah orang dan atau komunitas Tjina/China/Cina diubah menjadi Tionghoa, dan penyebutan negara Republik Rakyat China diubah menjadi Republik Rakyat Tiongkok.

Aturan Perundang-Undangan/Konvensi. (2004) United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime and the Protocols Thereto (Pdf). United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.