Eco-Social Welfare and Green Transformation: Policy Integration for Just Transition and Social Sustainability
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Global green transformation constitutes an ecological and technological transition, as well as a profound process of social restructuring that directly reshapes welfare systems, labor markets, and distributive justice. Despite this multidimensional character, dominant policy debates continue to privilege environmental performance and economic efficiency, thereby marginalizing the social foundations of sustainability. This qualitative exploratory study examines how eco-social welfare principles are articulated and operationalized within green transformation policies aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Using inductive document-based thematic analysis, the study analyzes sustainability through an SDG-centered social justice lens, with particular emphasis on SDG 1 (No Poverty), SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy), SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities), SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), and SDG 13 (Climate Action). The findings identify three interrelated eco-social domains shaping just transition dynamics: welfare adaptation to ecological risks and climate-induced vulnerability; inclusive governance and participatory justice; and capacity building and communication as foundations of community-based resilience. The results demonstrate that green transformation lacks democratic legitimacy and long-term social viability when social justice remains confined to normative commitments rather than being institutionally embedded in sustainability governance. By comparatively linking welfare adaptation, governance arrangements, and socio-communicative capacity across global policy discourses, the study contributes an analytically integrated perspective to the literature on just transition and eco-social policy, and advances the argument that SDG coherence cannot be achieved through technocratic green growth alone, but requires the systematic integration of social protection, participatory governance, and institutional trust into the core of environmental policy design.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
[1] ZIMMERMANN, K.: Varieties of Green Transitions? Comparative Welfare State Research and the Social Dimension of Green Transitions. European Political Science, doi: 10.1057/s41304-023-00456-3, 23 (1), 56–69 (2024).
[2] CUCCA, R., KAZEPOV, Y., VILLA, M.: Towards a Sustainable Welfare System? The Challenges and Scenarios of Eco-Social Transitions. Social Policies, doi: 10.7389/107136 (2023).
[3] BISCHLER, J., DANKMEYER, M.-C., BEHRENDT, C., SEGOVIA, M. C., LEVINA, K.: Social Protection and Active Labour Market Policies for Inclusive Green Structural Transformation. In: Rethinking Economic Transformation for Sustainable and Inclusive Development, Edward Elgar Publishing, doi: 10.4337/9781035348466.00012, 173–204 (2024).
[4] KOUSAR, S., BHUTTA, A. I., ULLAH, M. R., SHABBIR, A.: Impact of Economic and Green Growth on Poverty, Income Inequalities, and Environmental Degradation: A Case of South Asian Economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24191-2, 30 (12), 35200–35213 (2023).
[5] GHOUSE, G., ASLAM, A., BHATTI, M. I.: The Impact of the Environment, Digital–Social Inclusion, and Institutions on Inclusive Growth: A Conceptual and Empirical Analysis. Energies, doi: 10.3390/en15197098, 15 (19), 7098 (2022).
[6] SUN, H., MAO, W., DANG, Y., LUO, D.: What Inhibits Regional Inclusive Green Growth? Empirical Evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17250-7, 29 (26), 39790–39806 (2022).
[7] NEUHUBER, T.: One and the Same or Worlds Apart? Linking Transformative Regional Resilience and Just Transitions Through Welfare State Policies. Sustainability, doi: 10.3390/su17020637, 17 (2), 637 (2025).
[8] CRESPY, A., MUNTA, M.: Lost in Transition? Social Justice and the Politics of the EU Green Transition. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, doi: 10.1177/10242589231173072, 29 (2), 235–251 (2023).
[9] BARRIO, A., ROMERA, B. M.: The Role of Social Protection in Integrating Social and Climate Change Objectives in the European Union. Revista Catalana de Dret Ambiental, doi: 10.17345/rcda4131, 16 (1) (2025).
[10] FRITZ, M., LEE, J.: Introduction to the Special Issue: Tackling Inequality and Providing Sustainable Welfare Through Eco-Social Policies. European Journal of Social Security, doi: 10.1177/13882627231213796, 25 (4), 315–327 (2023).
[11] MANDELLI, M.: Harnessing Welfare State Theories to Explain the Emergence of Eco-Social Policies. European Journal of Social Security, doi: 10.1177/13882627231205759, 25 (4), 347–366 (2023).
[12] VOLTURO, S.: Towards a Sustainable Welfare? The Role of Social Work in the Fight Against Poverty from an Eco-Social Perspective. Social Policies, doi: 10.7389/107142 (2023).
[13] HAGEER, Y.: Bridging Equity and Resilience: A Systematic Review of Social Sustainability in Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation. Environmental Science and Policy, doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104243, 173, 104243 (2025).
[14] SABATO, S., MANDELLI, M.: Towards an EU Framework for a Just Transition: Welfare Policies and Politics for the Socio-Ecological Transition. European Political Science, doi: 10.1057/s41304-023-00458-1, 23 (1), 14–26 (2024).
[15] SÁNCHEZ-SORIANO, M., ARANGO-RAMÍREZ, P. M., PÉREZ-LÓPEZ, E. I., GARCÍA-MONTALVO, I. A.: Inclusive Governance: Empowering Communities and Promoting Social Justice. Frontiers in Political Science, doi: 10.3389/fpos.2024.1478126, 6 (2024).
[16] PINOARGOTE, P.: ILO Report 7A: Just Transition to Environmentally Sustainable Economies and Societies for All. International Labour Organization, Retrieved from https://coilink.org/20.500.12592/wdbs19f on 01 Jan 2026. COI: 20.500.12592/wdbs19f (2023).
[17] THOMAS, A.: Framing the Just Transition: How International Trade Unions Engage with UN Climate Negotiations. Global Environmental Change, doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102347, 70, 102347 (2021).
[18] CIGNA, L., FISCHER, T., ABUANNAB, E. H., HEINS, E., RATHGEB, P.: Varieties of Just Transition? Eco-Social Policy Approaches at the International Level. Social Policy and Society, doi: 10.1017/S1474746423000192, 22 (4), 730–746 (2023).
[19] LANG, M., BRINGEL, B., MANAHAN, M. A.: The Geopolitics of Green Colonialism: Global Justice and Ecosocial Transitions. Pluto Press, ISBN 978 0 7453 4936 7 (2024).
[20] CARLSEN, L., BRUGGEMANN, R.: The 17 United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals: A Status by 2020. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, doi: 10.1080/13504509.2021.1948456, 29 (3), 219–229 (2022).
[21] DÍAZ-PONT, J., CASAS, S., MARTINEZ, X.: Climate Policy and the Eco-Social Divide: The Discourse of Climate and Social Integration in Water Governance. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2025.2465671, 27 (4), 404–417 (2025).
[22] FATO, E.: Eco-Social Work: Theoretical Foundations and Implications for Sustainable Inclusion. In: Networks, Markets & People, Springer Nature, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-74679-6_42429–440 (2024).
[23] EMILSSON, K., FRITZ, M., HILDINGSSON, R., JOHANSSON, H., KHAN, J., KOCH, M.: Local Government and Eco-Social Integration. In: Pathways to Sustainable Welfare, Policy Press, doi: 10.51952/9781447372608.ch0033, 2–51 (2025).
[24] INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION: World Social Protection Report 2024–26: Regional Companion Report for Asia and the Pacific. ILO, doi: 10.54394/ZMDK5543 (2024).
[25] BAGOLLE, A., COSTELLA, C., GOYENECHE, L.: Social Protection and Climate Change: How Can We Protect the Most Vulnerable Households Against New Climate Threats? Inter-American Development Bank, doi: 10.18235/0004846 (2023).
[26] MALERBA, D.: Just Transitions: A Review of How to Decarbonise Energy Systems While Addressing Poverty and Inequality Reduction. German Institute of Development and Sustainability, doi: 10.23661/DP6.2022 (2022).
[27] TANG, J., HUANG, X., CHEN, H. H., GAO, W., LIU, X.: Environmental Regulation, Energy Poverty and Social Welfare: Based on China’s Provincial Panel Data. Energy Strategy Reviews, doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2024.101592, 56, 101592 (2024).
[28] NCUBE, T., et al.: Understanding the Climate, Migration, Social Protection Nexus from a Youth Mobility Dimension: Can Social Protection Address the Drivers of Climigration? Climate and Development, doi: 10.1080/17565529.2024.2380380, 17 (5), 436–457 (2025).
[29] LUPO, N.: Equity and Justice in the Green Transition: Towards Inclusive and Fair Climate Policies. Politecnico di Torino, Laurea Thesis, online: https://webthesis.biblio.polito.it/34586/ (2025).
[30] TOPALOGLOU, L., et al.: The Interplay Between Just Energy Transition and Community Engagement: Assessing Collaborative Pathways in Greece, Poland and Bulgaria. Energy Research and Social Science, doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103708, 116, 103708 (2024).
[31] SWARNAKAR, P., SINGH, M. K.: Local Governance in Just Energy Transition: Towards a Community-Centric Framework. Sustainability, doi: 10.3390/su14116495, 14 (11), 6495 (2022).
[32] BOSS, G., DIETZEL, A., GODSHAW, D., VENN, A.: Politics, Voice and Just Transition: Who Has a Say in Climate Change Decision Making, and Who Does Not. Global Social Challenges Journal, doi: 10.1332/EWME8953, 2, 86–104, (2023).
[33] STOJANOVIĆ, M.: Green Social Work and Community Resilience. Teme – Časopis za Društvene Nauke, 49 (1), 217–234 (2025).
[34] HERMANS, K., STAMM, I., MATTHIES, A.-L., ELSEN, S.: Ecosocial Work and Sustainability Transitions: Theories, Methodologies and Practices. Policy Press, doi: 10.51952/9781447376118 (2025).
[35] CUADRA, C. B., et al.: Exploring the “How” of a Just Climate Transition at the Local Level: Eco-Social Innovations and Governance. Sustainability Science, Practice and Policy, doi: 10.1080/15487733.2025.2548659, 21 (1), 2548659 (2025).
[36] HIRVILAMMI, T., PELTOMAA, J., PIHLAJAMAA, M., TIILIKAINEN, S.: Towards an Eco-Welfare State: Enabling Factors for Transformative Eco-Social Initiatives. European Journal of Social Security, doi: 10.1177/13882627231195724, 25 (4), 445–463 (2023).