Towards a process model of supervision in social work– a bibliometric analysis
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Supervision plays a pivotal role in social work, ensuring ethical practices, professional growth, and the delivery of quality services. This study conducts a bibliometric analysis to explore the evolving conceptualizations and applications of supervision in social work. Using the Web of Science Core Collection, a search for studies with "supervision AND social work" in their titles yielded 246 works. Full bibliographic records were downloaded and analyzed using VOSviewer software. A co-occurrence analysis of all keywords, with a minimum occurrence threshold of one, identified 89 keywords relevant to the topic. Excluded terms included regional and cultural-specific terms such as "England," "Ontario," and "Maori concepts," to maintain a focused and universal scope. The analysis revealed several thematic clusters encompassing clinical supervision, external supervision, crisis management, and child welfare supervision, among others. Notable themes include the intersection of supervision with burnout, cultural competence, and outcomes, highlighting its complex nature. The study emphasizes the significance of supervision frameworks tailored to diverse contexts and professional roles within social work. The findings contribute to the development of a process model for supervision, offering insights for researchers, educators, and practitioners to enhance supervisory practices. By identifying critical trends and gaps, this bibliometric analysis provides a foundation for future investigations aimed at refining supervision processes in social work.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Beddoe, L. (2017). Social work supervision for changing contexts. In Supervision in Social Work (pp. 82-95). Routledge.
Beddoe, L., & Maidment, J. (2015). Supervision in Social Work. London: Routledge.
Beinart, H., & Clohessy, S. (2017). Effective supervisory relationships: Best evidence and practice. Wiley.
Bostock, L., Patrizo, L., Godfrey, T., Munro, E., & Forrester, D. (2019). How do we assess the quality of group supervision? Developing a coding framework. Children and Youth Services Review, 100, 515-524.
Bourn, D., & Hafford-Letchfield, T. (2011). The role of social work professional supervision in conditions of uncertainty. The international journal of knowledge, culture and change management., 10(9), 41-56.
Bradley, B. H., Postlethwaite, B. E., Klotz, A. C., Hamdani, M. R., & Brown, K. G. (2012). Reaping the benefits of task conflict in teams: The critical role of team psychological safety climate. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024242
Brashears, F. (1995). Supervision as social work practice: A reconceptualization. Social Work, 40(5), 692-699.
Canavera, M., & Akesson, B. (2020). Supervision during social work education and training in Francophone West Africa: Conceptual frameworks and empirical evidence from Burkina Faso and Côte d’Ivoire. In Contemporary Practices in Social Work Supervision (pp. 139-154). Routledge.
Caras, A., & Sandu, A. (2014). The role of supervision in professional development of social work specialists. Journal of Social Work Practice, 28(1), 75-94.
Davys, A. M., & Beddoe, L. (2009). The reflective learning model: Supervision of social work students. Social Work Education, 28(8), 919-933.
Delcea, C., Rad, D., Gyorgy, M., Runcan, R., Breaz, A., Gavrilă-Ardelean, M., & Bululoi, A. S. (2023). A network analysis approach to romanian resilience-coping mechanisms in the Covid-19 era. Pharmacophore, 14(4-2023), 57-63.
Demeter, E., & Rad, D. (2020). Global life satisfaction and general antisocial behavior in young individuals: the mediating role of perceived loneliness in regard to social sustainability—a preliminary investigation. Sustainability, 12(10), 4081.
Dixon, J. (2010). Social supervision, ethics and risk: an evaluation of how ethical frameworks might be applied within the social supervision process. British Journal of Social Work, 40(8), 2398-2413.
Engelbrecht, L. (2010). A strengths perspective on supervision of social workers. Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 14(1), 47-58.
Frunza, A., & Sandu, A. (2018). Supervision of ethics in social work practice: A reconstruction of ethics expertise. In Ethical Issues in Social Work Practice (pp. 175-209). IGI Global.
Gardner, M., McKinstry, C., & Perrin, B. (2021). Clinical supervision frameworks for allied health professionals: a systematic and critical review. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 14(3), 15.
Gonsalvez, C. J. (2014). Establishing supervision goals and formalizing a supervision agreement. In C. E. Watkins Jr. & D. Milne (Eds.), The Wiley international handbook of clinical supervision (pp. 282–307). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118846360.ch12
Guttman, E., Eisikovits, Z., & Maluccio, A. N. (1988). Enriching social work supervision from the competence perspective. Journal of Social Work Education, 24(3), 278-288.
Hafford-Letchfield, T., & Engelbrecht, L. (2018). Contemporary practices in social work supervision: time for new paradigms?. European Journal of Social Work, 21(3), 329-332.
Harkness, D., & Poertner, J. (1989). Research and social work supervision: A conceptual review. Social Work, 34(2), 115-118.
Hasani, K., Sheikhesmaeili, S., & Aeini, T. (2015). The survey of cybernetic management and its relation to organizational health. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 28, 229-254.
Hess, A. K. (1986). Growth in supervision: Stages of supervisee and supervisor development. The Clinical Supervisor, 4(1–2), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1300/J001v04n01_04
Howard, S., Alston, S., Brown, M., & Bost, A. (2023). Literature review on regulatory frameworks for addressing discrimination in clinical supervision. Research on Social Work Practice, 33(1), 84-96.
Ioakimidis, V., Maragkozakis, A., Mourati, F., Papadopoulou, E., Papazoglou, A., Psyrraki, M. A., ... & Teloni, D. D. (2022). Rethinking social work supervision: is a ‘radical supervision’model possible?. Critical and Radical Social Work, 10(3), 405-421.
Iovu, B., Runcan, R., Runcan, P. L., & Andrioni, F. (2020). Association between Facebook use, depression, and family satisfaction: A cross-sectional study of Romanian youth. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 49(11), 2111–2119. https://ijph.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijph/article/view/15830
Kadushin, A., & Harkness, D. (2002). Supervision in social work (4th ed.). Columbia University Press.
Kahn, E. M. (1979). The parallel process in social work treatment and supervision. Social Casework, 60(9), 520-528.
Lee, E., & Kealy, D. (2018). Developing a working model of cross-cultural supervision: A competence-and alliance-based framework. Clinical Social Work Journal, 46(4), 310-320.
Marici, M., & Runcan, R. (2024). Between likes and anxiety: Understanding Instagram addiction’s role in appearance concerns. International Journal of Social and Educational Innovation (IJSEIro), 11(21), 232–251. https://journals.aseiacademic.org/index.php/ijsei/article/view/395
Munson, C. (2012). Handbook of clinical social work supervision. Routledge.
Ncube, M. (2019). A process model of social development supervision in social work. Southern African Journal of Social Work and Social Development, 31(2), 22-pages.
Ncube, M. (2019). Conceptualising social development supervision in social work. Social Work, 80(1), 31-45.
Newcomb, M. (2022). Supportive social work supervision as an act of care: A conceptual model. The British Journal of Social Work, 52(2), 1070-1088.
Newcomb, M. (2022). Supportive social work supervision as an act of care: A conceptual model. The British Journal of Social Work, 52(2), 1070-1088.
O’Neill, P., & del Mar Fariña, M. (2018). Constructing critical conversations in social work supervision: Creating change. Clinical Social Work Journal, 46, 298-309.
O'Donoghue, K. (2003). Restorying social work supervision. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore Press.
Peters, H. C., Bruner, S., Luke, M., Dipre, K., & Goodrich, K. (2022). Integrated supervision framework: A multicultural, social justice, and ecological approach. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 63(4), 511.
Peters, H. C., Bruner, S., Luke, M., Dipre, K., & Goodrich, K. (2022). Integrated supervision framework: A multicultural, social justice, and ecological approach. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 63(4), 511.
Pitt, C., Addis, S., & Wilkins, D. (2022). What is supervision? The views of child and family social workers and supervisors in England. Practice, 34(4), 307-324.
Rad, D., & Rad, G. (2021). Theories of change in Agile Psychology. Technium Soc. Sci. J., 21, 570.
Rad, D., & Rad, G. (2021). Theory of Change and agile community digital psychological interventions. Technium Soc. Sci. J., 20, 632.
Rad, D., Balas, V., Lile, R., Demeter, E., Dughi, T., & Rad, G. (2020). Statistical Properties of a New Social Media Context Awareness Scale (SMCA)—A Preliminary Investigation. Sustainability, 12(12), 5201.
Rad, D., Redeş, A., Roman, A., Ignat, S., Lile, R., Demeter, E., ... & Rad, G. (2022). Pathways to inclusive and equitable quality early childhood education for achieving SDG4 goal—a scoping review. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 955833.
Rad, D., Roman, A., Runcan, R., Toderici, O., Stoian, C. D., Sinaci, M., ... & Arion, F. (2024). Adapting To The Unseen: Understanding Workplace Learning Disruptions In Educational Counseling During The COVID-19. Migration Letters, 21(S8), 1236-1255.
Reamer, F. G. (1989). Liability issues in social work supervision. Social Work, 34(5), 445-448.
Redeș, A., Rad, D., Roman, A., Bocoș, M., Chiș, O., Langa, C., ... & Baciu, C. (2023). The Effect of the Organizational Climate on the Integrative–Qualitative Intentional Behavior in Romanian Preschool Education—A Top-Down Perspective. Behavioral Sciences, 13(4), 342.
Runcan, R. (2015). Facebookmania: The psychical addiction to Facebook and its incidence on the Z Generation. Revista de Asistenţă Socială, 14(3), 127–136.
Runcan, R. (2017). Psycho-social risks of Facebook communication. Revista de Asistenţă Socială, 16(2), 87–96.
Runcan, R. (2019). The issue of Facebook addiction in Romania: Vulnerable categories and the need to open clinics to treat this addiction. In V. Bucur, M. Vintină, & E. Bucur (Eds.), Community-based research: Multidisciplinary approaches to improve public health (pp. 47–50). Timișoara: Editura de Vest.
Runcan, R. (2020). Facebookmania or how virtual communication impacts human relationships. Timișoara: Editura de Vest.
Runcan, R. (2021). Teenage vulnerability: Social media addiction. In A. Breaz (Ed.), Vulnerabilities in social assistance (pp. 7–16). Cluj-Napoca: Presa Universitară Clujeană.
Runcan, R., Marici, M., & Rad, D. (2024). Descriptive Overview and Social Work Perspectives on NEET People. Social Work Review/Revista de Asistenta Sociala, (1), 37-49.
Runcan, R., Rad, D., Runcan, P., & Măduța, C. (2023). A network analysis approach toward adaptive overt narcissism network. Behavioral Sciences, 13(6), 468. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13060468
Sandu, A., & Caras, A. (2013). Philosophical Practice and Social Welfare Counselling and Supervision of Ethics. Philosophical Practice: Journal of The APPA, 8(3), 55-64.
Sandu, A., & Unguru, E. (2013). Supervision of social work practice in North-Eastern Romanian rural areas. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 82, 386-391.
Sandu, A., Unguru, E., Ponea, S., & Cojocaru, S. (2010). Analysis of professional competencies in social services supervision. Social Research Reports, 17, 3-56.
Scaife, J. (2019). Supervision in clinical practice: A practitioner’s guide (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Schreyogg, A. (1991). Organizational Analysis Applied to Supervision of Social-Work. Gruppendynamik-Zeitschrift Fur Angewandte Sozialpsychologie, 22(1), 5-18.
Scott, B. (2021). Cybernetics for the social sciences. Brill Research Perspectives in Sociocybernetics and Complexity, 1(2), 1-128.
Sewell, K. M. (2018). Social work supervision of staff: A primer and scoping review (2013–2017). Clinical Social Work Journal, 46(4), 252-265.
Tsima, D. L., & Ncube, M. (2023). Implementing the Supervision Framework for the Social Work Profession: Supervisors’ Views and Experiences. Southern African Journal of Social Work and Social Development, 35(3), 21-pages.
Tsui, M. S. (2004). Supervision models in social work: From nature to culture. Asian Journal of Counselling, 11(1-2), 7-55.
Unguru, E., & Sandu, A. (2017). Supervision. From Administrative Control to Continuous Education and Training of Specialists in Social Work. Revista romaneasca pentru educatie multidimensionala-Journal for Multidimensional Education, 9(1), 17-35.
Unguru, E., & Sandu, A. (2018). Normative and Institutional Frameworks for the Functioning of Supervision in Social Work. Revista romaneasca pentru educatie multidimensionala-Journal for Multidimensional Education, 10(2), 69-87.
Vandette, M. P., & Gosselin, J. (2019). Conceptual models of clinical supervision across professions: A scoping review of the professional psychology, social work, nursing, and medicine literature in Canada. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 60(4), 302.
Vîșcu, L. I., & Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2021). A guide to clinical supervision: The supervision pyramid. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2019-0-04076-9
Vîșcu, L. I., Cădariu, I. E., & Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2023). Competency-based training for clinical supervisors. Academic Press.
Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2012a). Development of the psychotherapy supervisor: Review of and reflections on 30 years of theory and research. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 66(1), 45–83. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2012.66.1.45
Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2012b). Educating psychotherapy supervisors. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 66(3), 279–307. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2012.66.3.279
Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2014). Leading and learning in the psychotherapy supervision seminar: Some thoughts on the beginnings of supervisor development. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 44(4), 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-014-9268-x
Watkins, C. E., Jr., Cădariu, I. E., & Vîșcu, L. I. (2024). "Let us begin well together": A preparation-positivity-purpose checklist for helping beginning supervisors optimize the start of supervision. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 54(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-024-09631-z
Wilkins, D., & Antonopoulou, V. (2019). What does supervision help with? A survey of 315 social workers in the UK. Practice, 31(1), 21-40.