From Curriculum to Construction: Mapping a Landscape of Transdisciplinary Practice in European Architecture and beyond | Technium: Romanian Journal of Applied Sciences and Technology

PDF

Published: Aug 18, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47577/technium.v30i.13134

Keywords:

Transdisciplinary design practices, architectural education, co-production

Andrea Jany

Wegener Center for Climate and Global Change, University of Graz

Abstract

This study explores how transdisciplinary approaches in architectural education manifest in built outcomes at the building scale in Europe. Using a structured set of 13 case studies across three typologies - Transdisciplinary Learning Laboratories, Participatory Housing & Community Prototypes, and Circular Design & Educational Studios - it maps the trajectory from curriculum-based pedagogies to real-world construction. Through comparative analysis, this study reveals patterns in knowledge co-production, stakeholder integration, and spatial realization. Key findings include the emergence of a curriculum-construction continuum, where student learning extends from conceptualization to implementation. In addition, the redefinition of students' roles as co-researchers and mediators across institutional boundaries and the importance of long-term partnerships between academia, municipalities, and industry. Furthermore, challenges in aligning academic timelines with construction processes and sustaining stakeholder engagement necessitate flexible regulatory mechanisms and new evaluation metrics for transdisciplinary work. This study contributes to ongoing debates in architectural education by demonstrating how transdisciplinary logic can be operationalized from curriculum to construction. It argues for a paradigm shift in architectural pedagogy towards more socially engaged, ecologically literate, and epistemologically reflexive approaches. The paper concludes by outlining future research directions, including longitudinal impact studies and the development of meta-analytical tools for assessing transdisciplinary studios’ effectiveness. Using a structured set of case studies, it maps the trajectory from curriculum-based pedagogies to real-world construction, categorized into three typologies: learning laboratories, participatory housing, and circular design studios. Through comparative analysis, this study reveals patterns in knowledge co-production, stakeholder integration, and spatial realization, offering a conceptual and empirical contribution to the discourse on transdisciplinary architecture.

How to Cite

Jany, A. (2025). From Curriculum to Construction: Mapping a Landscape of Transdisciplinary Practice in European Architecture and beyond. Technium: Romanian Journal of Applied Sciences and Technology, 30, 228–245. https://doi.org/10.47577/technium.v30i.13134

Issue

Vol. 30 (2025): Multidisciplinary research approach in advancement of Applied Sciences and Technology

Section

Articles

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Andersen, M., & Rey, E. (2019). Exploring: Research driven building design. Smart Living Lab design documentation. Park Books.

ArchDaily. (2023, May 23). Study Pavilion TU Braunschweig / Gustav Düsing + Max Hacke. ArchDaily.

Ascione, G. S., Cuomo, F., Mariotti, N., & Corazza, L. (2021). Urban Living Labs, Circular Economy and nature-based solutions: ideation and testing of a new soil in the city of Turin. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 1, 545–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00011-6

Brambilla, A., Nyffeler, C., Gasnier, H., Le Tiec, J.-M., & Misse, A. (2019). Low carbon thermal inertia for sustainable building performance. In Exploring: Research driven Building Design.

Brandt, H., Rammert, M., & Kuhn, K. (2022). Participation in Living Labs: From planning to implementation in the ENaQ project. In Urban Complexity and Sustainability Transitions (pp. 135–152). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-03866-3_9

Brandt, H., Rammert, M., & Kuhn, K. (2022). Participation in living labs: From planning to implementation in the ENaQ project. In Urban Complexity and Sustainability Transitions (pp. 135–152). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978 3 031 03866 3_9

CAT researchers (2011). Post-occupancy evaluation of WISE: Indoor environment quality, embodied energy and user responses. CAT research bulletin [Technical report].

Centre for Alternative Technology. (2010). The WISE Building [Technical report]. Centre for Alternative Technology.

de Jong, T. M., van Bueren, E. M., & Zandvoort, H. (2020). Circular development in BlueCity: Lessons from Rotterdam’s upcycling ecosystem. Sustainability, 12(18), 7404. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187404

De Jorge Huertas, V. (2020). Collaborative designing of communities: Helsinki and Zurich pioneers [Article]. ACE: Architecture, City and Environment, 15(43). https://doi.org/10.5821/ace.15.43.9012

Fontan, A., Farjadnia, M., Llewellyn, J., Katzeff, C., Molinari, M., et al. (2023). Social interactions for a sustainable lifestyle: The design of an experimental case study. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.11310

García-Hernández, C., García-Mayor, C., & Suárez, R. (2020). Experiences in transdisciplinary education for the sustainable development of the built environment: The ISAlab workshop. Sustainability, 12(3), 1143. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031143

Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage.

Haraway, D. J. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.

Huning, S., Räuchle, C. & Fuchs, M. (2021) Designing real-world laboratories for sustainable urban transformation: addressing ambiguous roles and expectations in transdisciplinary teams. Sustain Sci 16, 1595–1607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00985-0

Jarvenpää, M. (2017). Community housing and spatial well-being: A study of Casa Malta in Helsinki. Master’s thesis, Aalto University School of Arts, Design and Architecture. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/27161

JPI Urban Europe. (2019). SmarterLabs – improving anticipation and social inclusion in Living Lab experiments for smart city governance. https://jpi-urbaneurope.eu/project/smarter-labs/

Jusselme, T. B. P., Antunes Fernandes, P., Rey, E., & Andersen, M. (2019). Design guidance from a data driven life cycle assessment (LCA) based design method and tool prototype. 16th IBPSA Building Simulation Conference, Rome, Italy. https://doi.org/10.26868/25222708.2019.210403

Kieft, A., & Visscher, H. (2015). Concept House Village: Student and researcher collaboration in sustainable housing innovation. World Sustainable Building Conference Proceedings, 1–9.

Lang, R., Mullins, D., & Novy, A. (2021). Governing cooperative housing: Comparing multi-level policy frameworks in Zurich and Vienna. Urban Research & Practice, 14(1), 28–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2020.1749827

Lotfabadi, P., & Iranmanesh, A. (2025). Evaluating the incorporation of ecologically conscious building design methods in architectural education. Buildings, 15(8), 1339. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15081339

Maastricht University. (2023a). Toolkit SmarterLabs: Anticipating constraints on upscaling and inclusion in urban Living Lab experiments [Institutional report]. https://www.maastrichtuniversity.nl/research/msi/research-output/toolkit-smarterlabs

Maastricht University. (2023b). Living Lab experiment Maastricht: Smart & Future-proof Station Square [Institutional case overview]. https://smarterlabs.uni-graz.at/en/project-overview/living-lab-experiment-maastricht

Masseck, T. (2013). Teaching sustainability through living labs in architecture: The case study of the UPC LOW3 prototype. EESD 13 Conference Proceedings.

Masseck, T. (2017). Living Labs in architecture as innovation arenas within higher education institutions. Energy Procedia, 115, 383–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.05.166

Molinari, M., Rolando, D., & Pallard, W. M. (2020). Using living labs to tackle innovation bottlenecks: the KTH Live In Lab case study. BuildSIM Nordic 2020 Selected Papers.

Nicolau, J., Manzoni, A., & Gausa, M. (2021). Temporary tactical interventions as drivers for urban innovation: The case of the FURNISH project. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Urban Planning and Architectural Design for Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.4995/UP2021.2021.13453

Nicolescu, B. (2002). Manifesto of transdisciplinarity (K. C. Voss, Trans.). SUNY Press.

Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2011). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Polity Press.

Panayi, C., Roussou, E., & Charalambous, N. (2023). Architectural design studio: Embracing a transdisciplinary approach. In Proceedings of the EAAE Annual Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 96–97). European Association for Architectural Education. https://doi.org/10.1344/annual_conference.2023.186

Platform Space. (2019). Housing beyond and within the market, Part 2: Cooperative conditions in Zurich. Platformspace.net.

Puerari, E., De Koning, J. I. J. C., von Wirth, T., & Loorbach, D. (2018). Co-creation dynamics in urban living labs. In V. M. Bueren, H. van den Bosch, & J. Frantzeskaki (Eds.), Urban living labs (pp. 157–178). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99472-3_9

Rolando, D., Mazzotti Pallard, W., & Molinari, M. (2020). Long term evaluation of comfort, indoor air quality and energy performance in buildings: The case of the KTH Live In Lab testbeds. BuildSIM Nordic 2020 Selected Papers.

Russo, A., Molinari, M., & Proutiere, A. (2021). Data driven control and data poisoning attacks in buildings: The KTH Live In Lab case study. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2103.06208

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.

Silvester, S., Hooijer, B., van Oosterhout, R., & van der Kemp, F. (2017). Concept house village: A next step in the development of sustainable housing in the Netherlands. In Living Labs: Design and Assessment of Sustainable Living (pp. 371-384). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33527-8_28

Tanda, A., & De Marco, A. (2021). A review of an urban Living Lab initiative: the Torino Living Lab experience. Review of Policy Research, 38(3), 370–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12419

Tejedor, G., Olmos-Gómez, M. D. C., Riley, D., Lönngren, J., & Tan, M. (2020). Transdisciplinarity in higher education for sustainability: A literature review and future research agenda. Education Sciences, 10(2), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10020040

Till, J., & Schneider, T. (2007). Flexible housing: The means to the end. In Field: A Free Journal for Architecture (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 23–40).

TU Braunschweig. (2023). Study Pavilion on the campus of the Technical University of Braunschweig. TU Blog.

Zhuang, J., Chen, C., & Wang, J. (2024). Redesigning building thermal science education through inquiry-based experiential learning. Buildings, 14(11), 3455. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14113455

Article Sidebar

Main Article Content

Abstract

Article Details

References

Similar Articles